
We know our fans fell in love with the Wizarding World, and we believe they fell in love with it for the right reasons," he said. When we bumped into those challenges, we went back and refocused on the stuff that we really care about. "I think for us there are challenges in every game we've worked on. Here is how Alan Tew, the game's director, addressed those discrepancies. Rowling if she stands to profit from every unit that Hogwarts Legacy sells?

Is it possible to divorce the themes of love and belonging - so crucial to the Harry Potter canon - from its mercurial author? Can the Wizarding World ever be reclaimed from J.K. Rowling, has recently reinvented herself as one of the most prominent anti-transgender voices in the cultural gestalt, which has torpedoed much of the dizzy goodwill that Hogwarts Legacy was supposed to offer.Īs the game inches closer to release - only two weeks away - Portkey customers will be navigating a thicket of unresolvable ethical quandaries.

Hogwarts Legacy publisher WB Games also somewhat distanced themselves from Rowling in a statement released back in 2020, in which they said she was “not directly involved in the creation of the game,” though praised her “extraordinary body of writing.” WB Games’ president David Haddad also commented on the controversy surrounding the author, saying that “she’s entitled to express her personal opinion on social media.Unfortunately, the author and primary rights holder of the Harry Potter franchise, J.K. Her outspokenness on the topic caused Harry Potter actors Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint to speak out against the author, with Radcliffe publishing an open letter in which he stated: “Transgender women are women.” Rowling has been widely criticized in recent years due to comments she has made about the transgender community and public appearances she has made alongside many in the gender-critical community. "I never did it in public" won't save you when the police see your Hufflepuff socks.

All fine and dandy until you get drunk and accidentally quote one, sonny.

This individual actually advocates reading the books because "nobody needs to know". #DoBetter 1/2 /LqANqab8KmĪnd as for this, I'm appalled. The truly righteous wouldn't just burn their books and movies but the local library, anything with an owl on it and their own pet dogs. In response, Rowling tweeted that “the truly righteous wouldn’t just burn their books and movies but the local library, anything with an owl on it and their own pet dogs.”ĭeeply disappointed doesn't realise purethink is incompatible with owning ANYTHING connected with me, in ANY form.
